Share The Love

Showing posts with label Competitive Strategy. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Competitive Strategy. Show all posts

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Atoms Versus Bits: Where To Find Innovation

“We wanted flying cars. Instead we got 140 characters,” says Peter Thiel, the cofounder of PayPal and an early investor in Facebook. Thiel made billions from PayPal and Facebook, but he says the pace of innovation in the broader world has slowed way down.

Is Thiel right? The answer depends on whether you mean innovation in the world of atoms (physical things) or innovation in the world of bits (software).

•  Atoms: slowing. The Boeing 747 first flew in 1969, yet it still is the main jet carrying people across oceans. Automobiles still travel 70mph on our highways. They use less fuel and are safer, but the pace of improvement is nothing like it was 100 years ago.

• Bits: accelerating. The cellphone was the size of a brick 30 years ago. Six years ago it was much lighter, though still mainly a phone. Today it’s a camera, radio, television, credit card and disease diagnostic tool.

The most fertile areas for innovation become clear in this atoms versus bits view. If the atom world is slow to change, how can bits replace atoms or change the way we use them? Newspapers have transitioned from atoms to bits. Trickier are classrooms and health diagnostics, but they’re moving, too. Finally, bits will never replace such things as cars or airplanes (unless you think Scotty can beam you up), but they’ll change the way we use those things.

Take classrooms. I predict that 50% of colleges will fail during the next decade. The high ROI that a diploma once guaranteed is no longer certain. That’s because the “I” has grown way out of control, a result of decades of 7% annual price increases. Employers now have other and cheaper ways to test for intelligence and drive.

Online education got serious in 2012. Two open-enrollment online colleges–Coursera and Udacity–each raised more than $10 million in venture capital. Both have excellent parentage, started by professors from Stanford. Coursera plans to make money by selling certificates for around $100, verifying course completion. If you can earn a certificate for completing an artificial intelligence class taught by a Stanford professor, gee, where does that leave the math professor at the underfunded liberal arts college?

A second, less noticed kind of education revolution is aimed at replacing traditional corporate training. The Apollo Group, which owns the University of Phoenix, has made a big bet to create the Innovator’s Accelerator and has signed up noted Harvard Business School professor Clayton Christensen and others to teach corporate teams how to become more innovative. I was allowed a sneak peek at Innovator’s Accelerator; it looks like something George Lucas would have cooked up had he turned his creative talents to education. The Innovator’s Accelerator–or something like it–will soon change the $50 billion corporate training market as we know it.

A third way bits can transform atoms is to change the way we consume and value atoms. An example in air travel is XOJet, which has made private-jet travel cheaper.

XOJet, owned by Texas Pacific Group, was able to use TPG’s credit to buy scores of late-model jets on the cheap after the financial crisis. XOJet’s chief, Blair LaCorte, then imported strategies and tactics from two other businesses owned wholly or in part by TPG: low-cost air carrier Ryanair and resorts operator Harrah’s.

“We got people to think of private jets as nice hotel rooms to rent, not resort homes to fractionally own,” LaCorte says. XOJet owns 75 jets but has only three types: the Challenger 300, the Hawker 800XP and the Citation X. “We know how to maintain these three types,” he says. That’s crucial, because XOJet gets 1,200 annual hours of use from each jet, as opposed to 600 hours for the average fractional jet and 250 hours for the average privately owned jet.

XOJet’s volume means that you can rent a Challenger to go from Van Nuys, Calif., near L.A., to Teterboro, N.J., near Manhattan, for as low as $23,000. The more custom your needs–say, Santa Monica to White Plains at a precise time–the more the price will go up, of course. But thanks to the Internet and some clever analytics, XOJet is able to price each request, offer a smart deal and make money. Yes, it’s still a jet, but bits have transformed how the jet is being used.

Click here for more ideas on how to use innovation as a competitive strategy. 

Saturday, December 15, 2012

Focus On Your Competition - Testing Your Innovation Strategy

Article image

McKinsey

You thought you did everything right—gathered market research and consumer insights; brainstormed, prototyped, and tested a promising new idea; developed detailed financial models and a solid marketing plan. Yet your company’s new product or service didn’t perform as expected. What did you overlook?

If you answered “the competition,” you’re far from alone. In our experience, companies making decisions about developing and launching new products commonly fail to anticipate their rivals’ motivations and actions.1 Moreover, the failure often contributes to innovation-related disappointments, many of which are below the radar and quite insidious: your rival, for example, discounts prices to encourage customers to stock up on its product rather than try yours, ties up distributors so you can’t get shelf space, or duplicates your service to dissuade consumers from switching.

Unfortunately, in the heat of competition it’s extraordinarily difficult for players to identify such threats, because the tendency to overlook rivals is deeply ingrained in human behavior. Indeed, neglecting to think about competitors is one of dozens of natural human biases—along with excessive optimism and overconfidence—that subconsciously affect strategic decision making. Addressing the challenge requires tools and processes that help companies “debias” their decisions.2

Recognizing this problem, some companies are tackling it head on by integrating war games into their innovation activities. By simulating the thoughts, plans, and actions of competitors, these companies are improving their products and services, while gaining a deeper understanding of how their innovation assets compare with those of rivals—insights that help them better identify, shape, and seize opportunities.

In this article, we’ll look at how companies use war games to sharpen their products and services as they wrestle with three interrelated types of innovation decisions: those involving individual products, portfolios of offerings, and market-entry strategies. We’ll focus on situations involving medium-term innovations—new products or services expected within one to three years. While it’s obviously important to keep an eye on rivals at all times, competitive insights gleaned at this stage are particularly actionable, and a company’s ability to adjust its approach relative to competitors, and thereby to change the outcome, is high.

Product-level decisions

The development team of a consumer-electronics company was debating the mix of components and features to include in the next version of an important product. Advances in the underlying technology meant that the launch, planned for the following year’s holiday season, could well represent a significant upgrade that would influence several generations of the product.

To see how the competitive landscape might evolve—and be shaped—the company ran an in-depth war game. Over three days, cross-functional teams of product designers, marketing and sales experts, and supply-chain managers, assuming the roles of executives in the company and a leading rival, participated in a series of games representing three consecutive holiday seasons.

The choices the opposing team made were revealing, for it identified several new components and technologies the competitor might include in its own update of this kind of product. While there were obviously no guarantees the competitor would act as predicted, the rigorous preparation the company had undertaken to ensure that players on both sides would behave realistically suggested that the competitor’s rationale for making the moves would be strong.3 Moreover, if the competitor wasthinking along the lines the simulation predicted, the resulting changes to its product and market positioning would be significant, requiring a speedy and decisive response from the company.

Fueled by these insights, the company went on to identify a host of moves it could make to seize the initiative—including partnerships, bets on particular technologies, and an attractive, untapped consumer segment it could target to spur growth.

Ultimately, many of the game’s predictions did materialize, and when the competitor moved as expected with its new product, the company was ready. Its own updated product was a hit with consumers, and it went on to sell more units than the competitor did over the following three holiday seasons.

An additional insight the war-gaming process sparked was that meeting the needs of the consumers the company was targeting wouldn’t always require using the very latest technology. In some cases, an older—and cheaper—one was more than adequate. The company used this knowledge to its advantage in subsequent sourcing and pricing decisions.

To increase the likelihood of gaining such insights, the consumer-electronics company included a range of framing questions when it designed and ran the game. We include a sampling of them here as thought starters for any company looking to plan and run a product-focused war game of its own.

  • How much of a lead or leap—technological or otherwise—must we make in the next generation of our product or service?
  • How might our new product or service stand up to the pressures of the existing—and, potentially, the new—competitive landscape?
  • What price point will our product or service support and sustain?
Portfolio-level decisions

War gaming can also help companies develop and deploy their product portfolios more strategically across geographies and customer groups. Consider the experience of the global high-tech company whose leaders wanted to better understand how changing competitive dynamics would affect the company’s B2B business.

For years the company had sold a comprehensive range of specialized TV models to hotel chains across the price spectrum. (Compared with the company’s consumer models, the hotel TVs were more robust, had additional software features, and in some cases were more energy efficient.) Recently, though, new competitors had begun arriving on the scene in force, and competition had increased broadly. To learn what effect the new conditions might have on the company’s portfolio of products and how they were positioned, it created four rival teams, each representing a new or established competitor, and ran a series of war games against them.

Learn how operational dexterity can help you maximize effectiveness. Read More >>

The results suggested the threat was bigger than the company had suspected. Notably, several of the games quickly degenerated into value-destroying price wars. That outcome helped company leaders understand how quickly its high-end TVs would migrate down to the buyers from lower-cost hotels as rivals discounted prices on their own higher-end units to gain market share. If the company were to maintain its pricing policy, the executives recognized, the resulting profit squeeze would be enormous.

In response, company leaders essentially decided to ignore certain market segments, where price competition would be fiercest—areas it had strongly contested before. Instead, the company would place its biggest innovation and marketing bets on serving midscale hotels. In this growing segment, it had a better chance of differentiating some of its existing products and services, and of creating more value for customers (by helping hotels capture additional revenue streams, for example). The company went on to identify several possible partnerships with players in the industry value chain. It has successfully leveraged these partnerships to begin implementing the new strategy.

Useful questions the high-tech company considered when planning and running the game included the following:

  • Which product classes will face the most competition, and will supply-side dynamics or customer demand drive it?
  • Can we adapt any of our existing products to differentiate them further for the geographies or segments that will face the most pressure?
  • Which customer segments will our competitors focus on, and how do these segments overlap with the ones our new offering targets?
Go-to-market decisions

Finally, war games are a useful way of testing and refining launch strategies to help ensure that new product and service offerings get the most traction in the market.

That’s what happened when a financial-services firm wanted to determine which of a handful of promising new services had the greatest potential to reach global scale quickly and thus should be fast tracked. Company executives were particularly keen to test one technology-driven service that they felt had the potential to catch rivals off guard and to capture additional revenues from much-coveted business customers.

The company ran a series of simulated launches pitting itself against three rival teams whose members began the games unaware of the new service. Executives were surprised to learn how quickly and convincingly the opposing teams reacted to the offering and developed a version of their own. Worse, in some cases an opponent team’s offering appeared superior to the company’s, or at least close enough that company executives felt it would be tough for business consumers to differentiate between the two. “If we go to market with this offer,” said one team member, “we’ll get creamed.”

This exercise had a sobering effect on the executives, who began to recognize that overconfidence and excessive optimism had clouded their thinking. The company has since gone back to the drawing board and is using many of the observations gathered from the war game to help improve the new service and its market positioning.

Notably, the company’s team of developers has also begun identifying ways to use the service’s underlying technology to create entry barriers that could help delay a competitive response by up to a year. Given the tendency of players in the industry to copy good ideas quickly, the ability to create such barriers—and to include this skill in regular development activities—should serve the company well in years to come. Questions that it considered in the design and execution of its game included the following:

  • What ideas could put our product or service out of business in the next one to three years?
  • Can we create value and continued appeal with our service given the possible responses of attackers and other competitors, our responses to them, and their responses to our responses, over a defined period of time?
  • What next versions and extensions are required to keep our idea in play, sustainable and scalable, and how do we start building them now?

War games are a tried-and-true strategic tool, yet relatively few companies use them to innovate. Those that do so effectively can not only avoid the problem of overlooking what the competition might do but also determine how likely their new products and services are to survive in the crucible of the marketplace. via Mckinsey 

Jim Woods is about helping companies and people engage innovate and grow in all the areas important to them. Jim is a professional speaker, author, coach, and strategy consultant based in Colorado Springs, Co. Follow Jim on Twitter @innothinkgroup, Facebook https://www.facebook.com/InnoThink Group or check out his company website http://innothinkgroup.com for more tips and strategies effective leadership, engaged employees, increase growth, and customer effectiveness through innovation. To arrange for Jim to consult or speak at your event email Jim.

 Click here to arrange for Jim to speak to or consult with your organization.

Monday, November 26, 2012

How Accountability Improves The Growth Of Your Business

When I go to a business I make it a point to look at the evaluations of all the top leaders and managers and their direct reports. I will meticulously review nearly all of them. I then go through all the high-potential people who were previously moved there because of their progress and performance.  I identify those who aren’t performing, and decide what to do about them.  I follow through with a three-or five-page memo to them individually.  Then I go back six months later and review to see that those actions were taken.

If that approach of accountability cascades down through your organization as it’s supposed to, it will change your workforce and top line growth. It has ben my experience that people rise to the level of a leader’s expectations. 

Jim Woods is principal and founder of InnoThink Group. Jim is a business turnaround expert. His story is riveting. He has worked with government, U.S. Army, MITRE Corporation, Pitney Bowes, Whirlpool, and 3M. Jim’s business experiences, extensive research on competitive strategy and innovation have given him a fresh perspective on improving individual and organizational performance. Jim is a prolific speaker on strategic innovation, creative leadership, uncertainty and competitive strategy. Speak with us for consulting or speaking engagements call 719-266-6703 or click here for more information. Follow Jim on Twitter. Follow Jim on Facebook.  

Friday, October 5, 2012

Competitive Advantage Learn How Richard Branson Works Magic

Richard Branson, the 48-year- old chairman of the London-based Virgin Group, has parlayed a lifelong disdain for conventional business wisdom into a $3.5 billion international conglomerate and one of the world's most powerful and recognizable brands. Under the ubiquitous Virgin banner, Mr. Branson has ventured into a panoply of businesses - from condoms to wedding gowns, from airlines to financial services - and in the process has taken on entrenched giants and wrested market share from them.

All the while, the flamboyant and irreverent Mr. Branson has tweaked the business establishment, particularly in Britain, and displayed a P.T. Barnum-like command of publicity and showmanship to gain priceless cachet for the Virgin brand. He has been, for much of the past 30 years, one of the most admired Britons, and his fame has spread in recent years around the globe as Virgin has expanded its reach and its luster.

Mr. Branson loves nothing more than a daunting challenge; he views the impossible as just another business opportunity. Who else but Mr. Branson would put the vibrant Virgin label on the decaying British Rail with hopes of turning the dilapidated railroad into a sleek, profitable business? And throughout his career, he has cleverly embraced the David role, taking on Goliaths like British Airways, EMI Music and Coca-Cola, with the intent of becoming the best rather than the biggest and working under the assumption that there are significant profits to be made in small pieces of big markets.

His trademark is outlandish publicity stunts. He will do almost anything to promote the Virgin brand: driving a tank down Fifth Avenue in New York to introduce Virgin Cola to the United States, risking his life in high-profile hot-air balloon adventures or portraying a drowning victim on television's "Baywatch."

 

Indeed, so crucial is the continued high profile of Virgin that Mr. Branson says his highest paid and most important employee is Will Whitehorn, his public relations and communications director. "I suspect in most companies, the public relations person is down at No. 20 in the pecking order," Mr. Branson says. "But, here, he is fighting incredibly important battles. If a negative story starts running away with itself in the press and is not dealt with fast, it can badly damage the brand. And so we put enormous weight on our public relations people."

Mr. Branson reportedly sets aside at least 25 percent of his time for public relations activities, and Mr. Whitehorn has a staff member whose sole responsibility is devising the headline-catching publicity stunts for which Mr. Branson has become known. "If your staff works enormously hard to create something they are proud of, it's foolish if you don't let the world know about it," Mr. Branson states. "Using yourself to get out and talk about it is a lot cheaper and more effective than a lot of advertising. In fact, if you do it correctly, it can beat advertising hands down and save tens of millions of dollars."

But Mr. Branson stands for more than balloon trips and powerboat races across the Atlantic. Behind the brash and insouciant huckster, there lies a sharp business visionary who has created a formula for success that is rife with lessons for chief executives in any country and any business. The Branson magic is not about smoke and mirrors, but rather is a kind of chicken soup for the moribund, tradition-bound corporate soul. Mr. Branson's success reflects an uncanny ability to take the consumer's point of view as his own and Þnd ways to embrace that view for profit.

Despite his personal riches, Mr. Branson has retained an "everyman" persona marked by his casual dress, affable and modest manner, and devilish disrespect for convention. He understands viscerally the concerns and needs of his customers and his employees and acts as a conduit for fulfilling those needs. He has built the Virgin brand in his own image, and the result is an extremely positive emotional bond between consumers and companies that bear the Virgin label. It is brand-builder's nirvana, made all the more impressive because the brand is all that ties together more than a hundred disparate Virgin businesses. There is little synergy or shared resources among the Virgin companies; Virgin, in fact, resembles the classic Japanese keiretsu such as a Yamaha or Mitsubishi.

Branding An Ethos
With Virgin, Mr. Branson has displayed remarkable staying power that is made possible only by adhering to his own carefully honed set of business values. From the winter of 1969, when as a 19-year-old wunderkind he founded his first venture - a mail- order record business, which evolved into a recording studio dubbed Virgin Records - Mr. Branson established a clear business ethos that had its genesis in the anti-establishment counterculture of the 1960's and remained steadfast even as the company grew and Mr. Branson himself evolved from the "hippie capitalist" into a widely admired billionaire.

 

Writing in a British management journal, Alan Mitchell noted that Mr. Branson found his winning formula in the clashing values of the 60's: profit versus people; money versus morality; the corporation versus the consumer; big (business) versus small (human); formal versus informal; planning versus spontaneity; conventionality versus novelty; hierarchy versus egalitarianism; secrecy versus openness. Mr. Branson always chose the humanistic path, and "yet uniquely, he's turned these values back on business itself, forging an unexpectedly vibrant synthesis," Mr. Mitchell wrote.

The vibrant synthesis is based on a set of five criteria that Mr. Branson has incorporated into every business he has started and every joint venture he has entered. A product or service cannot hope to bear the Virgin label unless it meets these conditions:

  • It must have high quality.
  • It must be innovative.
  • It must provide good value for the money.
  • It must be challenging to existing alternatives.
  • It must have a sense of fun.

With these core values as the common thread, Mr. Branson has entered one business after another in which he perceived a customer set that was being underserved by a fat and complacent dominant player. Whereas most would avoid such elephantine competition as British Airways or Britain's entire financial services industry, Mr. Branson sees a "bigger, softer underbelly" that is vulnerable to attack. He calls it the "Big Bad Wolf" theory. "We look for the big bad wolves who are dramatically overcharging and underdelivering," he explains.

When he was approached in the early 1980's with the idea of starting an airline, for example, Mr. Branson was intrigued. He had long been frustrated by the poor service and inattention to customer needs of monopolistic airlines like British Airways. Though he had become a millionaire in the music industry with Virgin Records and though his business partners were aghast at the idea that he would risk the profitable company on a business he knew nothing about, Mr. Branson saw opportunity. "Tell Richard that something is impossible and watch his eyes light up," says David Tait, head of Virgin Atlantic's North American operations.

In Virgin Atlantic, Mr. Branson designed an airline to please himself, figuring he embodied the typical air traveler. Starting with a single 747-200 in 1984, Virgin Atlantic began flying the popular London-to-New York route with two things in mind: lower prices and better service. While a passenger is stuck in a metal tube for seven hours, why not serve better meals; offer more entertainment; have smiling, enthusiastic flight crews, and create fun? Eschewing first class, Virgin Atlantic would offer a first-class experience at business-class prices.

In the past 14 years, the airline has shaken up the industry with innovative ground and on-board service and entertainment. Virgin Atlantic offers spa-like lounges in its hub airports replete with showers, putting greens, haircuts, massages and manicures. In the air, more massages, manicures and full sleeping outfits are available for its business-class passengers. It was the first airline to offer more than two choices of meals, even in economy, and it was also the first to put seat-back videos in every seat on every plane.

Mr. Branson, who favors the airline perhaps more than any other part of his empire, flies frequently and usually spends the entire flight chatting with passengers, serving drinks, leading games over the public address system and helping the flight crew with even the most menial tasks. In the early days, when there were far fewer than the current 22 aircraft in Virgin's fleet, Mr. Branson regularly appeared at Heathrow Airport to apologize personally to disembarking passengers if a flight was late. Though he cannot physically be on every flight, Mr. Branson's presence is felt through the enthusiasm evident in his employees, most of whom seem to be simply having a better time at their jobs than their counterparts on other airlines.

 

And all Mr. Branson has done is insist on treating his customers as he himself wished to be treated. This was nothing short of revolutionary in the airline industry. In short order, Virgin Atlantic has become an industry favorite, winning countless travel awards and becoming the second largest long-haul carrier on the London-to-New York route. Growth has been measured, steady and slow as Virgin Atlantic has expanded into eight United States cities as well as Asia and South Africa. Mr. Branson now has his sights set on building a domestic United States carrier if he can tear down the barriers blocking foreign-owned airlines from offering routes within the United States.

THE MEASURE OF SUCCESS

Like other great entrepreneurs, Mr. Branson is unafraid of failure. But unlike many other successful business leaders, he refuses to stay within the confines of a single core business. Rather than "sticking with what you know," Mr. Branson's credo is "if you know one business, you know any business." He adds: "If you can run a record company, you can run an airline. If you can run an airline, you can run a bank. If you can run a bank, you can run a soft drink company." And on and on.

He acknowledges that his philosophy is centered on finding the best people to run these businesses, but he insists that he is not so much concerned about industry-specific expertise as strong people skills that mesh with the Virgin culture. "What makes somebody good is how good they are at dealing with people," Mr. Branson states. "If you can find people who are good at motivating others and getting the best out of people, they are the ones you want. There are plenty of so-called experts, but not as many great motivators of people."

Virgin tends to promote from within, and the winning profile, not surprisingly, is Branson-like: someone who gets charged up when told that something cannot be done; someone who is undaunted by industry barriers and will not take no for an answer.

And Mr. Branson tends to focus far less on profits and far more on industry impact. Because Virgin is privately held, Mr. Branson declines to talk about specific numbers. He says, "It's important to pay the bills." But once Virgin reached solid financial ground in the early 1990's -- mainly from the $1 billion sale of the Virgin Records label to Thorn-EMI -- and survival was no longer an issue, Mr. Branson's attentions were focused on higher ground.

He says his measure of success is creating a business whose practices are completely different from the way others do things, whose staff can be proud and whose product or service makes a positive impact on consumers. "There's no point in going into a business unless you shake up the whole industry," Mr. Branson says. "Then, you are not just making a difference for yourself. You find the whole industry has to react to your being there and change the way it does business."

Tired of giving 5 percent of his money on the day he signed up with a financial services company, for example, Mr. Branson started Virgin Direct, which eliminated the fine print and the hidden fees and quickly started winning customers from competitors. In just two years, Virgin Direct, a firm somewhat like Fidelity or Vanguard in the United States, has brought in more than 400,000 customers and has $3.5 billion under management. Every other financial services company in Britain has had to reduce its rates to compete, which is just the kind of reaction Mr. Branson relishes. He says he has his sights set next on the British telecommunications industry.

A STAR IS BORN

Ever the radical, Mr. Branson says his only business role model was a person who had failed. Fellow iconoclast and entrepreneur Freddie Laker had attempted to take on British Airways with a low-cost trans-Atlantic airline a few years earlier and had been driven out of business by the competition. Nevertheless, Mr. Branson, sensing a kindred spirit, sought Mr. Laker's counsel in the early 80's. The airline, Mr. Laker advised him, had to concentrate not just on low cost but also on offering quality and value for the money. It had to be innovative and, most of all, fun. The airline's employees, therefore, were the real asset, not the planes.

And it was Mr. Laker who brought out the Barnum in Mr. Branson. "Freddie Laker sat me down and said, 'If you are going to take on Pan Am, T.W.A. and British Airways, you've got to use yourself and get out there and realize that if you dress up in a captain's outfit when you launch the airline, you'll get on the front page. If you turn up in ordinary business clothes, you'll be lucky to get a mention. Remember, the photographers have a job to do; they'll turn up to one of your events and give you one chance. If you don't give them a photograph that will get them on the front page, they won't turn up to your next event.'"

Despite his public persona, Mr. Branson claims to be shy and introverted. He says he had to force himself to make speeches, embrace the photo opportunities and take part in the public relations soirees. But, he tells other chief executives, it can be done. "Before we launched the airline, I was a shy and retiring individual who couldn't make speeches and get out there," he says. "I had to train myself into becoming more of an extrovert."

And the metamorphosis has paid off. His outrageous stunts and accessibility to the media have provided huge competitive advantage in the brand wars. For example, his media stunts in introducing Virgin Atlantic's new "drive-through" airport check-in, and later Virgin Cola, spawned widespread newspaper coverage and led to five-minute segments on NBC's "Today" show and a national audience of millions of Americans -- at no cost to Virgin. He won a highly publicized libel settlement of nearly $1 million from British Airways in the early 1990's and milked the David-slaying-Goliath angle for all it was worth.

Mr. Branson is quite pleased that most business leaders remain below the parapets. "From a competitive point of view, the longer they continue to think that way, the better for us," he states. He relates a conversation with a BBC producer who told him that 99 out of 100 invitations to British chief executives to appear on television are refused. Conversely, Virgin is always available for air time. "With a television spot, you are reaching 10 million people," Mr. Branson says. "It would be bloody stupid to say no."

EMPLOYEES FIRST

A genius for publicity, however, is only one facet of Mr. Branson's business talent. Perhaps more crucial to his success is his order of priorities. While most chief executives focus on creating shareholder value and devote their attention primarily to customers, Mr. Branson believes that the correct pecking order is employees first, customers next and then shareholders. His logic is simple and sound: If your employees are happy, they will do a better job. If they do a better job, the customers will be happy, and thus business will be good and the shareholders will be rewarded.

To this end, Mr. Branson goes to unusual lengths. He regularly takes out entire flight crews for dinner and parties when he arrives on a Virgin Atlantic flight. He even stays at the crew's hotel rather than in expensive digs downtown. He gives every Virgin employee a Virgin card, which provides big discounts on the airline as well as at Virgin Megastores and other Virgin businesses.

 

Are your competitors talking about you in their boardrooms? Does your strategy guide how you allocate resources? We see strategy as much more than a plan. See how.

 

Because of Virgin's many disparate businesses, Mr. Branson likens his role to that of a commander of many armies fighting battles around the world. "In a sense, you are ultimately directing the war, and the critical thing is constantly being in touch and motivating your troops and helping people if they've got a problem," he says.

So he is continually on the road, visiting Virgin businesses, talking with employees and customers. Mr. Branson is known for his ever-present notebook and pen, which he pulls out whenever he chats with employees or customers. He insists that this is a crucial element in his role as chairman and that by writing things down, he creates a regular list of items for immediate action. Most chief executives, he notes, will chat with employees in the course of their travels but by the next day will remember little of what they were told.

Mr. Branson reads mail from employees every morning before he does anything else. This habit, which he started in Virgin's early days, changes the company-employee dynamics dramatically. Employees do not hesitate to air their grievances directly to Mr. Branson, and he has proved with his actions that he not only listens but also responds. He says that although Virgin has 20,000 employees around the world today, he gets only 25 to 30 letters each morning. "It's not as many as you think because they know they can do it," he explains.

The letters run the gamut, from small ideas to frustrations with middle management. Mr. Branson addresses every one either by answering personally or by initiating some action. "Instead of needing a union when they have a problem, they come to me," he says. "I will give the employee the benefit of the doubt on most occasions." His loyalty to the rank-and-file employees is returned in kind. Working for Virgin, especially in Britain, is nothing short of a badge of honor.

While being interviewed for this article, for example, Mr. Branson was vacationing on his private Caribbean island, called Necker. Along with him for his sojourn, he had brought 20 employees from various Virgin companies. And these were not senior executives, but the rank and file -- a housekeeper from Johannesburg, a switchboard operator, a reservations clerk, a pilot -- who were invited because of excellent performance. This is a regular perk for Virgin employees, and Mr. Branson, rather than feeling intruded upon, delights in the company.

"The idea is to have fun, but by talking to employees, you learn a lot as well," he says. Reminded that it is the rare chief executive who takes employees along on vacation, Mr. Branson laughs and says, "I can assure you, it's no sacrifice." But it sends a powerful message and creates enviable loyalty in his growing work force. In fact, Virgin employees are as likely to say they "work for Richard" as for Virgin.

Mr. Branson also hosts an annual summer party for all Virgin employees at his country home outside London. This year the party lasted seven days, and more than 25,000 employees and family members attended. Nearly all were greeted at the door by Mr. Branson, who is likely to be the first in the swimming pool. He also attends as many orientations for new staff as possible in order to set the tone and send the message. "I say: 'Get out there and have a good time. Really enjoy yourself, because most of your life is spent working, and you ought to have a great time doing it.' It's much nicer paying the bills when everybody is having a good time."

And all the while, Mr. Branson is Virgin's most enthusiastic cheerleader, offering constant praise to employees for their efforts. He recalls how his mother and father always looked for the best in their children, and he does that now with his own son and daughter. "I will praise, praise, praise," he says, "and only criticize if they are going to kill themselves crossing the road. People know when they've done things wrong; they don't need to be told. When I write my letters to employees, you'll never see a line of criticism."

STAYING THE COURSE

But if Mr. Branson is part father figure, part psychologist and part camp counselor, he is also an astute and demanding businessman. He can be ruthless, manipulative and controlling, according to various press reports about him. He insists, for example, that Virgin have no less than 50 percent stake in any company bearing the Virgin label and that his managers retain control of the operations.

He has also orchestrated shrewd business deals that helped finance Virgin's growth without using the company's money. Mr. Branson says such deals are possible only because of the strength of the Virgin brand. For example, the recent creation in Britain of the Virgin bank, which is an operation separate from Virgin Direct, was financed to the tune of $500 million by other investors, and Virgin retained a 50 percent stake without coughing up a penny. "We're launching new companies that are 100 percent funded by external investors based on the power of the brand," he says.

It would seem that the very power of the brand would be kept under tight control, lest it become diluted. Yet, being an inveterate risk taker and thrill seeker, Mr. Branson needs big challenges to keep him interested. Taking on Coke and Pepsi was one way to do that.

Virgin Cola, according to Mr. Branson, is ready to overtake Pepsi in Britain, and he insists the soft drink will outsell Pepsi outside North America in his lifetime. About Coca-Cola, he is more restrained. He does not expect to topple Coca-Cola, arguably the world's best brand, anytime soon. But this does not bother Mr. Branson in the least. He says that Virgin Cola will grab a market share of 1 percent or 2 percent in the United States and that this will be "enough to pay the bills and get a base to start building on." The real challenge, he adds, "is taking on the biggest brand in the world and seeing what we can do with it."

Acknowledging the gamble on cola, Mr. Branson suggests that he is taking an even bigger risk in putting the Virgin name on the British Rail, Britain's most run-down and neglected network. With no money invested in its infrastructure in the past 30 years, the public train system was simply grinding to a halt when Virgin decided to run it privately. The company is investing $2 billion on new high-speed trains and a renovation of all the tracks. But it will be four years before the restoration is complete, and so the Virgin label must endure being associated with an inferior product for a long stretch.

The company, Mr. Branson says, could not pretend that Virgin had not taken over ownership. Efforts to improve existing conditions have already paid dividends in the first 12 months, with on-time performance improving from 78 percent to 90 percent and 16 percent more people using the trains, resulting in a £25 million profit, compared with a loss of £20 million the year before.

Nevertheless, Mr. Branson admits that "this is the biggest risk we've taken with the brand in Britain." Disgruntled passengers who never bothered to complain when the British Rail name was on the trains feel justified in airing their frustrations now that Virgin graces the engines. Though Virgin has failed at other business investments and escaped with its reputation intact, sustained problems with the railroad could tarnish the brand.

But Mr. Branson, ever the optimist, foresees a positive outcome. "You can't be afraid to take risks," he says. "I believe that if my balloon goes down in 10 years' time, the success we've made with Virgin trains will be a greater part of my legacy than Virgin Atlantic. There may be short-term damage, but in the long run, it was the right thing to do."

Though the Virgin brand is so inextricably tied to his name, Mr. Branson insists that the brand will live on even if one of his risky adventures does him in prematurely. "It will be a different kind of brand, probably more mature than it's been before and slightly less risque," he says. "But there is no reason commercially that it shouldn't go on in strength."

The more crucial lesson, he says, is retaining the values he has instilled even as the company grows larger and larger. "You've got to treat people as human beings -- even more so as the company gets bigger," Mr. Branson says. "The moment I start to think 'I've made lots of money, I'm comfortable, I don't need to bother with these things anymore,' that's when Virgin will be at real risk."

BRANSONISMS
Richard Branson did not become a favorite of the business media solely on the basis of his publicity stunts; he is also eminently quotable in sound bites. Here are some gems from our interview with him:

"Obviously, the David image has done Virgin no harm. And if we ever became a Goliath, I think another David would set up and take us on."

"You never enter a new business unless it will enhance the brand."

"You fail if you don't try. If you try and you fail, yes, you'll have a few articles saying you've failed at something. But if you look at the history of American entrepreneurs, one thing I do know about them: An awful lot of them have tried things and failed in the past and gone on to great things."

"We look for the big bad wolves who are dramatically overcharging and underdelivering."

"There are quite a few things I've done that even I thought might have been one step too far. But if you are willing to make a fool of yourself and make people smile -- as long as you do it with a sense of fun -- you can get away with it.""We look for the big bad wolves who are dramatically overcharging and underdelivering."

"We're launching new companies, 100 percent funded by external investors, based on the power of the brand."

"I'm absolutely certain that in my lifetime we will overtake Pepsi in the world outside America."

"If something happens to me, bizarrely, it might be the best thing that happens to the brand in that when a rock star gets killed, the sales of his albums triple. As long as I go quick, with my reputation still intact, then I think the brand can go on living well indefinitely."

"If you grow a company from scratch, you can get the right people from day one; you can get the products right from day one, get the pricing right. It's much easier."

"In a sense, you are ultimately directing the war and the critical thing is to be constantly in touch and constantly motivating your troops and to see how you can help people if they've got a problem."

"I'm not 100 percent sure that children should go on and run their parents' business, because they are not necessarily the right people to do it."

"If you can find people who are good at motivating others and getting the best out of people, they are the ones you want."

Reprint No. 98406


Authors Glenn Rifkin, glennrifkin@worldnet.att.net
Glenn Rifkin has covered technology for the New York Times and has written for the Harvard Business Review and Fast Company. He is coauthor of Radical Marketing (HarperBusiness, 1999) and The CEO Chronicles (Knowledge Exchange, 1999).

 

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

How To Avoid Commoditization - Scott Dadich on Designing Wired Magazine

Today Lipitor the world's best selling drug will become generic. Sadly, so will most businesses. That is called commoditization. Commoditization is ordinarily mind numbing despite well intentioned. In a business it is when not enough people salivate for your product; when customers go elsewhere. Commoditization is a greater scourge than the economy. Avoiding it can be the sought after accelerator out of the Great Recession. Below Scott Dadich of Wired Magazine provides a simple way to meangifully be distinctlybetter. Eh - Let's just call this what it is. Hmmm. How about innovating? That'll work. Talk to us about our 28 day program to strengthen your innovation capabilities to drive growth.  

 

Consulting, Speaking & Coaching. Driving Growth through Innovation  

Innothink Group is a strategic management and innovation consultancy. Where many consulting firms are reluctant to bear risks or tie their rewards to project outcomes, we decided to build a better model. We align our success with yours. We’re outcome obsessed, outcome paid, putting over a third of our fees at risk subject o hitting predetermined milestones. More than a guarantee we wanted from the outset to create true partnerships. 

For speaking, coaching or consulting inquiries contact: 

CEO Jim Woods

+1 719- 649-4118

How To Develop A Growth Mindset - Innovation on Low (or No) Budget

The Boeing 787 Dreamliner can seat up to 250 passengers and haul a half-million pounds. The Boeing (BA) jet has a range of up to 8,200 nautical miles and reaches a maximum speed of nearly 650 miles per hour. Its development required an investment of some $30 billion.

The new Big Dinner Box from Pizza Hut (YUM) can haul two medium pizzas, eight wings, and five breadsticks. It has a range of a few zip codes and reaches a maximum speed of what the delivery driver can get away with. Its development required, well, a different kind of cardboard box.

My point? How simple some innovations can be. You don’t have to have a monstrous research and development budget (or even a test kitchen, for that matter) to innovate. You just have to be alert to your customers’ needs and wants—and creative and responsive in addressing them.

Some innovations do require many years and billions of dollars to develop; witness the Chevy (GM) Volt, which took nearly four years and more than a billion dollars to go from concept car to street legal. (The verdict is still out as to whether it will become a commercial success.) Contrast that with Dr Pepper 10, a soda that targets men who don’t like the taste (or the idea, perhaps) of diet soft drinks. By using a different sweetener and throwing in a tad of good, old-fashioned high fructose corn syrup, Dr Pepper Snapple Group (DPS) came up with a formula that is showing such positive initial returns that the company is already expanding the concept to five of its other brands.

“A Better Way to Deliver Value”

The key to innovation is to not wring your hands about what you don’t have—a giant research budget and staff of PhDs—and focus on what you do have: a relationship with your customers.  Saul Kaplan, founder of the Business Innovation Factory, defines innovation in very simple terms: “a better way to deliver value.” In a recent interview, Kaplan explains what he means: “It is not an innovation until it solves a problem that a customer is having—it delivers value in the real world, solves a problem, and helps get a job done that a customer is trying to do. A lot of people confuse innovation with invention, and think that they just need new technology to solve a problem. But an innovation is not the same as an invention.”

He’s right. Inventions are almost always innovations, but innovations don’t have to be inventions. They just have to be a better way to deliver value. This Christmas, many personal-care product makers such as Procter & Gamble (PG) and Unilever (UL) are putting together gift boxes of toiletries as prosaic as deodorant and toothpaste. If that sounds like the contents of your medicine cabinet, it is. Still, by packaging their products as “affordable luxuries,” these companies are meeting consumers’ needs for simple, inexpensive stocking stuffers. That may not work so well in neighborhoods with circular driveways, but for the rest of us, it’s a gift we could really use. And while our gift-giver stretches his or her budget by (literally) getting a package deal, the manufacturers get to increase exposure and move more product.

Who would have thought a handful of personal-care items would make a great Christmas gift? Not me, but some enterprising packaged goods makers were paying attention to what highbrow cosmetic brands have done for years and have simply applied the concept to their own customers. That’s a helpful template for fostering creativity in innovation—combining two previously unrelated ideas into something refreshing and new. Dr Pepper found something refreshing by combining a diet soda and a regular soda and positioning it for people whose desires weren’t being fully met by either. P&G discovered something new by combining consumer staples with fashion thinking to create a simple, practical gift for challenging economic times. Pizza Hut combined a delivery box with a confectioner’s sampler so it could sell more of every kind of product it serves. You may read this splendid article in entirety via businessweek.com

How is your business doing? Speak to us about our guarantee that can increase your top line growth! 

Jim Woods is president and founder of the InnoThink Group. He is a no nonsense "tell it like it is" author, speaker, and a strategic management, innovation, commoditization and hypercompetition expert to business and government. He advises clients with an objective view of their competitive capabilities and defines a clear course of action to maximize their innovation return on investment to achieve profitable growth. To build your capability for ongoing innovation across your company or to secure a riveting speaker for your next event - Call 719-649-4118 or email us for more information on hiring Jim. Check Availability. 

How to Use Innovation Design to Drive Innovation

Designers must deliver the orchestration of the total experience with a brand, product, or service or face irrelevancy

 

In a previous era, all the talk was of strategy, strategy, strategy. More recently, it's been innovation, innovation, innovation. As design thinking seems poised to sweep away some of today's celebrated innovation practices, we must be wondering what new provocation is on the horizon. Relax, I'm not planning to conjure one up.

For those of us on the design consulting side of the business, it has not exactly been a smooth ride lately. But then again, I can't say that I ever remember it being all that smooth, even when the demand for all forms of basic design and new production capability was sky-high.

Having lived one career on the corporate design side of the consumer-products industry and now a good part of another on the consulting side, I've seen the ascendancy of design as a profession and the movement of design toward business competency. At the outset, designers were about style and the creation of bright shiny objects, and we dutifully manned our post at the last decoration station on the way to the marketplace.

Today, there are arguably two design strategies in the marketplace. You either succeed as the low-cost producer, or you successfully differentiate your offering by design in a relevant, meaningful way that is valued by shoppers, consumers, and sellers. As such, the theoretical role of design in business is relatively uncomplicated and straightforward.

Design in Business

The complications come with these two questions: Where does the core idea around a differentiated, relevant, valued offering come from? And what is its relationship to this thing we used to call design? You know—the bright shiny objects.

In our practice, we refer to the former as innovation strategy, and to the latter as design strategy. Somewhere in between resides the opportunity for brand strategy, and we hope to create a system in which there is a seamless flow from ideas to brand meaning and, finally, to how that brand or product or service is expressed and communicated.

Putting all three aspects of this brand-building practice together provides validity in thinking about design as one of the primary idea generators for the creation of viable business platforms. Assuming that the manifestation of a business offering is realized in the context of a brand, that brand requires meaning, a defined expression, and then, given some success, a plan for continued opportunity development that sustains and grows the business.

How to Innovate

True innovation requires the adoption of a belief system that sometimes must prevail in the face of other data metrics. Read up on the great inventions and business wins and you will note that at the core of most of them lie belief, dedication, and the passion to succeed. Today's business leaders are often too afraid to move ideas forward without ironclad data proofs that they will be successful. All too often, they are the losers. Use your head, listen to your heart, and feel what's in your gut.

As long as the human spirit and the marketplace lives on, I'm sure we will be inventing and innovating. Innovation is the commercial side of discovery and invention. Change is a huge driver of both discovery and invention. The world changes around us and we discover new things and we observe change and invent new things to deal with change.

If designers are content to function as purveyors of bright shiny objects, they will likely fade into obscurity. On the other hand, if they step forward and deliver the orchestration of the total experience with a brand, product, or service in the context of our changing environment, their future, too, looks bright. via businessweek.com

Speaking 

As the CEO and founder of InnoThink Group, Jim can help your organization enhance the strategic innovation and competitiveness of your business policy and strategy, with an emphasis on increasing top line growth.  

If you’re interested in having Jim speak at your next event, simply use this form to send us your details and speaking requirements, and we’ll be in touch shortly. Or you may call us at 719-649-4118. Thank you!

 

Thursday, April 26, 2012

How To Make Creative Play Work: Mark McGuinness

Follow Us

Every creator knows the terror of the blank page. When you start on a new creative challenge and you have no idea how you are going to solve it, the virgin paper (or screen, or canvas, etc.) seems to stretch off endlessly in all directions. There are so many things you could do, it's impossible to know where to start. And as a creative professional, you pride yourself on coming up with original solutions. It's what your clients pay you for, or what your audience loves you for. So the pressure to 'make it new' can make it even harder to get going.

Next time you find yourself in this situation, ask yourself this question:

"Have I ever solved a problem like this before?"

It doesn't matter if the problem isn't an exact match - scan your memory for something even remotely similar. Then go back and revisit your old work, to see if there's anything there that could help you now.

I first came across this technique when I trained as a psychotherapist. Working with clients facing seemingly intractable problems such as long-term depression, substance abuse, or the breakdown of a marriage, I found myself using this question over and over again - with some surprisingly good results.

 

The pressure to 'make it new' can make it even harder to get going.

 

 

Clients coming for therapy are understandably so focused on their problem that they forget or discount the many times when they have dealt with it effectively - or at least not disastrously. So when I asked this question, they were often able to remember times when they managed to motivate themselves to do something productive, and felt less depressed; or times when they resisted the cravings to use drugs; or when they managed to resolve disagreements with their partners in a respectful manner.

No, it didn't change their lives overnight. But it often gave them a foothold on the problem - a small success that boosted their confidence and opened up the possibility of achieving more. And it can do the same for you, next time you're wondering if you're up to a creative challenge.

"But won't this lead to me repeating myself?"

Only if you keep working on the same old types of project. But if you keep setting yourself new challenges, then that will force you to build on your old knowledge by adding something new to the mix.

The big advantage of starting with one of your old solutions - apart from the motivational boost from getting a foothold on the problem - is that you are building from a foundation of success, using something that has been tried and tested and delivered results.

 

One of the reasons clients pay more for experienced creatives is that they have a wealth of previous successes to draw on, which can give them a shortcut to success. Of course, you also need to make it new - but you knew that already.
--
What do you think?

Have you ever used an old solution as the starting point for a new project? What was your approach? via the99percent.com

Traditionally, when facing low-cost competition companies try to cut costs or innovate. This trap leads them in never-ending cycles of competitive disadvantage. Survival requires smarter and subtler responses. Contact InnoThink Group to discuss your options. We are a leading Strategic Management and Innovation Consulting Firm. 

Sunday, April 15, 2012

How The World's Biggest Company Works With The World's Most Populous Nation - Walmart Is Changing China

Follow Us


How Walmart Is Changing China

The world’s biggest corporation and the world’s most populous nation have launched a bold experiment in consumer behavior and environmental stewardship: to set green standards for 20,000 suppliers making several hundred thousand items sold to billions of shoppers worldwide. Will that effort take hold, or will it unravel in a recriminatory tangle of misguided expectations and broken promises?

By Orville Schell

 

 

A Map of Walmart in China


From sea cucumbers in Dalian to upscale Sam's Clubs in Shanghai, Walmart stores vary from province to province.

Stepping into the building’s vast, windowless interior, I have the sense of entering an oversize Fabergé egg. But instead of refined scenes of aristocratic czarist life, I encounter thousands of middle-class Chinese engaging in the newest, and already the most inalienable, right in this erstwhile “People’s Republic”: shopping. This is the Shijingshan Shanmuhui, a Sam’s Club, one of the 352 stores that Walmart now operates in 130 Chinese cities.

Just inside the doorway, a scrum of salespeople hawk everything from roasted sweet potatoes to fitness-club memberships and massage chairs. Throngs of energetic customers push overflowing carts (fitted with data screens touting the latest bargains) making that familiar sound of wobbling rubber wheels on concrete. Indeed, its familiarity makes me feel I’ve been astrally projected back to Walmart’s natal place—Bentonville, Arkansas, which the current president and CEO, Michael Duke, recently referred to as the “Lighthouse of the Ozarks.”

But the young Chinese women workers in green aprons and sanitary masks make it undeniable that we’re a long way from the Ozarks. They call out their wares in Mandarin, proffering samples of soya-bean milk, date juice, and lychee jelly. Around them are mountainous piles of fresh pig intestines; pillow-size bags of dried fungus, seaweed, and mushrooms; packages of desiccated deer tendons (still attached to hooves!); inky-black dehydrated sea slugs; glistening octopuses on nests of chopped ice; and tanks of gulping fish, dazed frogs and turtles, and hyperactive shrimp.

Although Walmart’s $7.5 billion in Chinese sales receipts account for only 2 percent of the company’s annual revenues, its sales in China have risen substantially over the past decade. Sales in the United States, by contrast, have been shrinking. And as China’s retail market—the world’s fastest-growing—expands by 18 percent a year, Walmart’s executives smell the intoxicating scent of more growth to come. Equally important, if not more so, some 20,000 Chinese suppliers, or “partners,” reportedly provide Walmart with about 70 percent of the nearly $420 billion worth of goods that it sells globally each year. (Because of the complexity of the global supply chain, the percentage from China is hard to calculate.) China has become so crucial to Walmart’s supply chain that in 2002, the retail giant moved its global sourcing headquarters across the border from Hong Kong to Shenzhen, in southern China. 

As I tramped across the country, from Shenzhen to Manchuria and from the North China Plain to Sichuan province, visiting Walmart retail outlets, factories, farm cooperatives, and executive offices, the Walmart/China axis loomed as something unprecedented. Beyond the sheer scale of the relationship, what struck me was how interactive Walmart and China have become.

Of course, over the past century and a half, most of the foreign missionaries, merchants, military emissaries, and educators who have sallied forth in hopes of “changing China” have returned home with little to show for their efforts. Like nitinol, a unique nickel-titanium alloy that possesses “shape memory,” bending at low temperatures only to regain its original form when heated, China has long rebuked foreign efforts to change it. So one might plausibly wonder why Walmart, a company that is so indelibly American, might now have an experience that is any different.

Indeed, Walmart has deep roots in conservative, southern, small-town, fundamentalist-Christian, anti-union, middle-American values. The founder, Sam Walton, was an ardent capitalist, devoted Christian, and militant anti-Communist who rolled all these values up into a quasi-religious/political credo, a founding faith for a business praised by then–Vice President Dick Cheney as “one of our nation’s great companies,” exemplifying “some of the very best qualities in our country—hard work, the spirit of enterprise, fair dealing, and integrity.” I encourage you to read this article in entirety at via theatlantic.com

Speaking 

As the CEO and founder of InnoThink Group, Jim can help your organization enhance the strategic innovation and competitiveness of your business policy and strategy, with an emphasis on increasing top line growth. 

 If you’re interested in having Jim speak at your next event, simply use this form to send us your details and speaking requirements, and we’ll be in touch shortly. Or you may call us at 719-649-4118.